Difference between revisions of "Creoliste Biblioshare"

From Creolista!
Jump to: navigation, search
(Why?)
(Why?)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Why?==
 
==Why?==
  
Main reasons:
+
Main reasons I think this software is interesting:
# It is possible to generate clean user-delimited bibliographies with this program in a variety of formats (including BibTex, Endnote, HTML) which means that it can be exported into Zotero, Refworks, etc...
+
# It is possible to generate clean user-delimited bibliographies with this program in a variety of formats (including BibTex, Endnote, HTML) which means that it can be exported into Zotero, Refworks, etc...  In other words, the data is free and transmutable.
# Any user can edit any field in any entry.  (à creuser... et les possibilités de défaire les modifs? ^^)
+
# Any user can edit any field in any entry.  (à creuser... et les possibilités de défaire les modifs? (états? chronjobs?))
 
# It is possible to link directly to any reference or group of references
 
# It is possible to link directly to any reference or group of references
# Wikipedia often fails when references are misrepresented.  Focusing attention on sources rather than relegating them to footnotes seems very healthy, insofar as it respects academics' and journalists' work.  It also allows five people to comment on one reference.
+
# Wikipedia often fails when references are misrepresented.  Focusing attention on sources rather than relegating them to footnotes seems very healthy, insofar as it respects academics' and journalists' work.  It also allows five people or fifty to comment on one reference.
# The project is actively maintained.
+
# The WIKINDX project is actively maintained. (I'm running v3.82, [https://sourceforge.net/p/wikindx/news/2016/03/wikindx-51-beta-in-svn/ v5] is already in beta.)
  
 
==When?==
 
==When?==
 +
Now!
  
 
==What?==
 
==What?==
The program is Wikindx, developed by Mark Grimshaw.  I'm working on a [Wikindx|Creoliste manual].
+
The program is Wikindx, developed by Mark Grimshaw.  I'm working on a [[Wikindx|guide]].
 +
 
 +
==Where?==
 +
[http://biblio.creoliste.fr here]
 +
 
 +
==Who?==
 +
Why not you? ^^

Latest revision as of 07:57, 15 February 2017

Why?

Main reasons I think this software is interesting:

  1. It is possible to generate clean user-delimited bibliographies with this program in a variety of formats (including BibTex, Endnote, HTML) which means that it can be exported into Zotero, Refworks, etc... In other words, the data is free and transmutable.
  2. Any user can edit any field in any entry. (à creuser... et les possibilités de défaire les modifs? (états? chronjobs?))
  3. It is possible to link directly to any reference or group of references
  4. Wikipedia often fails when references are misrepresented. Focusing attention on sources rather than relegating them to footnotes seems very healthy, insofar as it respects academics' and journalists' work. It also allows five people or fifty to comment on one reference.
  5. The WIKINDX project is actively maintained. (I'm running v3.82, v5 is already in beta.)

When?

Now!

What?

The program is Wikindx, developed by Mark Grimshaw. I'm working on a guide.

Where?

here

Who?

Why not you? ^^