Difference between revisions of "Get"
(→resume of main causatives in English) |
(→possessive) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
=possessive= | =possessive= | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>The present perfect form of the verb "get" --> <i>have got</i>, <i>has got</i> indicates possession, filiation, and localisation, in the same way as <i>have</i>:</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <ol> | ||
+ | <li>I have got a new umbrella.</li> | ||
+ | <li>I have got a husband/wife and two kids.</li> | ||
+ | <li>I have got a headache/cold/problem. (etc.)</li> | ||
+ | </ol> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>In UK English: Questions and negations, like question tags, are formed with the auxiliary have:</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <ol> | ||
+ | <li>Have you got a minute?</li> | ||
+ | <li>I haven't got time to finish this tonight.</li> | ||
+ | <li>You've got a minute, haven't you?</li> | ||
+ | </ol> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>In American English: In questions <i>have</i> is often omitted. Negations require the auxiliary. The question tag is generally formed with "do": | ||
+ | |||
+ | <ol> | ||
+ | <li>You got a minute?</li> | ||
+ | <li>I haven't got time to finish this tonight.</li> | ||
+ | <li>You've got a minute, don't you?</li> | ||
+ | </ol> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>Unlike <i>have</i>, however, it is impossible to express either future or past possession, filiation, and localisation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <ol> | ||
+ | <li> I had (*got) a new umbrella, but I lost it.</li> | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
=obligative= | =obligative= | ||
Revision as of 07:38, 13 January 2013
Contents
[hide]Data
possessive
The present perfect form of the verb "get" --> have got, has got indicates possession, filiation, and localisation, in the same way as have:
- I have got a new umbrella.
- I have got a husband/wife and two kids.
- I have got a headache/cold/problem. (etc.)
In UK English: Questions and negations, like question tags, are formed with the auxiliary have:
- Have you got a minute?
- I haven't got time to finish this tonight.
- You've got a minute, haven't you?
In American English: In questions have is often omitted. Negations require the auxiliary. The question tag is generally formed with "do":
- You got a minute?
- I haven't got time to finish this tonight.
- You've got a minute, don't you?
<p>Unlike have, however, it is impossible to express either future or past possession, filiation, and localisation.
- I had (*got) a new umbrella, but I lost it.
- She got pregnant in May and gave birth in February. (pregnant = ADJ)
- I usually get to work before 9 and get home around 7.
- We need to get the ball rolling.
- Let's get started.
- I usually get paid on the 6th.
- She gets back late on Thursdays.
- We got the project finished on time, but it wasn't easy!
- Its hard to get it right all the time, but we do try.
- She tried to get fired for several years, but as a civil servant that's not always easy to do.
- It's getting easier and easier to get lost in my mailbox. I need to delete some messages!
- It's getting a bit harder to find a coin-operated public pay phone these days.
- They're getting better at calling us back when we leave a message.
- I had them come. (because that's just part of my power... Bwahaha!)
- I got them to come. (because I'm persuasive... re-bwahaha!)
- I asked them to come. (not a causative as such, because I'm not sure they're coming)
- Get emphasizes both the difficulty and the exchange involved in imposing one's will on someone or something.
- I finally got them to send me the bill.
- It's hard to get landlords to refund a damage deposit.
<
obligative
punctual/ inceptive
difficulty
attributive
comparative
Get, because it is a verb used when the grammatical subject is both SUBJECT and OBJECT of the action or predication, is often used with state changes and comparatives:
mediapassive
causative
resume of main causatives in English
make SO/STH V, , *I made them come. (I forced them to...)
have SO/STH V/V-en,
get SO/STH to V
ask SO to V (persuade, convince, force, etc.)