Difference between revisions of "Not"

From Creolista!
Jump to: navigation, search
(form)
(form)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
<p>The grammatical rules are relatively simple.</p>
 
<p>The grammatical rules are relatively simple.</p>
*<span color="darkblue">not becomes <span color="darkblue">n't when attached to an auxiliary which is not itself abbreviated.
+
*<span color="darkblue">not</span> becomes <span color="darkblue">n't</span> when attached to an auxiliary which is not itself abbreviated.
 
**I've not heard much. // I haven't heard much.
 
**I've not heard much. // I haven't heard much.
 
**I'm not sure. //  I ain't going. (<i>ain't</i> is fairly widespread colloquial American)
 
**I'm not sure. //  I ain't going. (<i>ain't</i> is fairly widespread colloquial American)
*I personally do not combine n't with may or might, though there is nothing particularly wrong with "mightn't" even if it is relatively infrequent.  "Shan't" is pretty much dead as the negation of "shall" which has seen its realm of application reduced drastically. (compare at google: couldn't // mayn't // shan't)
+
*I personally do not combine <span color="darkblue">n't</span> with <i>may</i> or <i>might</i>, though there is nothing particularly wrong with <span color="darkblue">mightn't</span> even if it is relatively infrequent.  <span color="darkblue">shan't</span> is likewise rare.. (compare at google: <span color="darkblue">couldn't // mayn't // shan't</span>)
  
 
<p>Usage rules are fairly strict.  In formal writing abbreviations are to be avoided.  The only accepted use of the apostrophe in formal writing is generally to indicate the possessive / genitive case.  This is a prescriptivist, but pragmatically important, rule to know.</p>
 
<p>Usage rules are fairly strict.  In formal writing abbreviations are to be avoided.  The only accepted use of the apostrophe in formal writing is generally to indicate the possessive / genitive case.  This is a prescriptivist, but pragmatically important, rule to know.</p>
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
<blockquote>Counselor: You <span color="darkblue">couldn't have known that Doug <span color="darkblue">wasn't coming.  <br />
 
<blockquote>Counselor: You <span color="darkblue">couldn't have known that Doug <span color="darkblue">wasn't coming.  <br />
Therapist:  I <span color="darkblue">didn't know; and I <span color="darkblue">wouldn't have re-arranged my schedule if I <span color="darkblue">hadn't thought he would be there.<br />
+
Therapist:  I <span color="darkblue">didn't</span> know; and I <span color="darkblue">wouldn't</span> have re-arranged my schedule if I <span color="darkblue">hadn't</span> thought he would be there.<br />
Counselor: He <span color="darkblue">hasn't been coming to those meetings for several weeks.
+
Counselor: He <span color="darkblue">hasn't</span> been coming to those meetings for several weeks.
Therapist:  I <span color="darkblue">won't make the same mistake twice.  Next time, if he isn't coming, I <span color="darkblue">ain't going either!   
+
Therapist:  I <span color="darkblue">won't</span> make the same mistake twice.  Next time, if he <span color="darkblue">isn't</span> coming, I <span color="darkblue">ain't</span> going either!   
Counselor:  We should send the secretary a message Thursday, <span color="darkblue">don't you think, just to confirm?
+
Counselor:  We should send the secretary a message Thursday, <span color="darkblue">don't</span> you think, just to confirm?
Therapist:  Oh, you <span color="darkblue">mustn't have heard, the secretary resigned yesterday.   
+
Therapist:  Oh, you <span color="darkblue">mustn't</span> have heard, the secretary resigned yesterday.   
Counselor:  Oh no, he <span color="darkblue">shouldn't have.  I'm not surprised though.  He <span color="darkblue">wasn't happy about all the criticism last month.  Things may not have been perfect,  but at least things got done.
+
Counselor:  Oh no, he <span color="darkblue">shouldn't</span> have.  I'm not surprised though.  He <span color="darkblue">wasn't</span> happy about all the criticism last month.  Things may not have been perfect,  but at least things got done.
 
Therapist:  Absolutely.  Back to Doug again.  Doesn't he have a cell phone?
 
Therapist:  Absolutely.  Back to Doug again.  Doesn't he have a cell phone?
 
Counselor:  No.  </blockquote>
 
Counselor:  No.  </blockquote>

Revision as of 02:06, 23 January 2014

negation

form

  • not or n't

The grammatical rules are relatively simple.

  • not becomes n't when attached to an auxiliary which is not itself abbreviated.
    • I've not heard much. // I haven't heard much.
    • I'm not sure. // I ain't going. (ain't is fairly widespread colloquial American)
  • I personally do not combine n't with may or might, though there is nothing particularly wrong with mightn't even if it is relatively infrequent. shan't is likewise rare.. (compare at google: couldn't // mayn't // shan't)

Usage rules are fairly strict. In formal writing abbreviations are to be avoided. The only accepted use of the apostrophe in formal writing is generally to indicate the possessive / genitive case. This is a prescriptivist, but pragmatically important, rule to know.


Counselor: You couldn't have known that Doug wasn't coming.

Therapist: I didn't know; and I wouldn't have re-arranged my schedule if I hadn't thought he would be there.
Counselor: He hasn't been coming to those meetings for several weeks. Therapist: I won't make the same mistake twice. Next time, if he isn't coming, I ain't going either! Counselor: We should send the secretary a message Thursday, don't you think, just to confirm? Therapist: Oh, you mustn't have heard, the secretary resigned yesterday. Counselor: Oh no, he shouldn't have. I'm not surprised though. He wasn't happy about all the criticism last month. Things may not have been perfect, but at least things got done. Therapist: Absolutely. Back to Doug again. Doesn't he have a cell phone? Counselor: No. </blockquote>


Remember: the apostrophe has two uses in English: it represents a missing vowel:

  • the "o" of not
  • the "a" of are (You're, We're, They're)
  • the "a" of am (I'm (I am))
  • the "ha" of "have" (I've (I have))
  • the "i" of "is" (it's (It is))

or it represents possession: Sofiane's / Luke's / Zeke's / Mohammed's / the students' notebooks.

a third case in literature: represent missing sounds more generally.

(cf. genitive case)</p>

adverb

Negations of this sort are considered to be adverbs by almost all dictionaries, like the words yes and no. Some Indo-European examples:

  • nicht (Germ.)
  • non (Lat.)
  • pas (Fr.)
  • nje (не) (Russ.)

predeterminer

Some deny the existence of determiners (articles, demonstratives, quantifiers), so the idea that a grammatical class such as predeterminers should exist is not always welcomed easily, especially by those who teach what is known in France as la grammaire scolaire.

  • Not a one
  • Not everybody
  • not some time later (6m examples at Google, not a few of which are difficult to evaluate grammatically)
  • not a few of which
  • not the least of which

In any case, it is clear that the boundaries between adverbs and determination in the noun phrase (particularly deictic determination: today, tomorrow, this, that) are relatively fuzzy. At least four of the examples would clearly seem to be noun phrases.