Difference between revisions of "WS:haveto"
From Creolista!
								
												
				| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| <ul> | <ul> | ||
| − | <li>The first sounds of <i>have to</i> and <i>has to</i> can <u>not</u> be phonetically reduced <span style="color:green;">hæ/span> | + | <li>The first sounds of <i>have to</i> and <i>has to</i> can <u>not</u> be phonetically reduced <span style="color:green;">hæ</span> | 
|    <ul> |    <ul> | ||
|       <li>never becomes <span style="color:green;">ə(v)tə</span> as <i>have</i> alone can when preceding a past participle. (<i>could have gone</i>, for example) </li>   |       <li>never becomes <span style="color:green;">ə(v)tə</span> as <i>have</i> alone can when preceding a past participle. (<i>could have gone</i>, for example) </li>   | ||
Revision as of 17:03, 6 April 2020
Contents
[hide]have to V / need to V
phonetics
The most basic tools used to express obligation, they form a phonetic unit with the following verb. In the most informal speech, one hears:
- They all need to see a doctor.  
 ni:dtə 'si:
- We have to stop using so much petrol.
 hæftə 'stɑp
- I really have to go now. 
 hæftə 'goʊ
- She has to finish cooking the books.
 hæstə 'fɪnɪʃ
- The first sounds of have to and has to can not be phonetically reduced hæ
  - never becomes ə(v)tə as have alone can when preceding a past participle. (could have gone, for example)
- has to never becomes z as has can in She's got time. for example
 
The reduction takes place around the pivot "to", as with the verbs going to V and want to V, where even the t disappears!
- I'm going to go.  (sometimes written: I'm gonna' go.)
 aɪm 'ɡɔnə 'goʊ
- I want to be... (sometimes written: I wanna' be.)
 aɪ 'wɑn ə bi
Exercise 1: Pronunciation
Practice pronouncing these verbal elements in a relaxed register:
- has to start:  
 hæstə 'stɑrt
- had to stop: 
 hædtə 'stɑp
- have to start dealing with: 
 hæftə 'stɑrt 'di: lɪɳ wɪθ
- don't have to pick her up today:
 'doʊnthæftə 'pɪkər 'ʌptə 'deɪ
- has to get it done: 
 'hæstə 'getɪt 'dʌn
- 'll have to get it done: 
 (ə)l'hæftə 'getɪt 'dʌn
Asking questions about obligations
have to and need to both require do-support for questions in the present or the past:
- Do you need to lie down?
- Do you have to work tomorrow?
- Did you have to work yesterday?
- Did you need to see a doctor?
For questions in the future the auxiliary will or its negative form won't are used:
- Won't you need to buy insurance?
- Will you need to take time off?
- Won't you have to ask accounting?
- Will you have to pay taxes this year?
Exercise 2: Find the mistakes
If there is a mistake in the sentence, correct it. If there is no mistake, leave it as it is...
- We'll have to work on this next week.
- We had work on this last week.
- Did you have to take time off from work?
- Have you to pay taxes?
- She has to get ready for a civil service exam (concours)
- He have to change the oil in the car this weekend. (change the oil = faire le vidange)
